Review of police detentionN.I.
41.—(1) Reviews of the detention of each person in police detention in connection with the investigation of an offence shall be carried out periodically in accordance with the following provisions of this Article—
(a)in the case of a person who has been arrested and charged, by the custody officer; and
(b)in the case of a person who has been arrested but not charged, by an officer of at least the rank of inspector who has not been directly involved in the investigation.
(2) The officer to whom it falls to carry out a review is referred to in this Article as a “review officer”.
(3) Subject to paragraph (4)—
(a)the first review shall be not later than six hours after the detention was first authorised;
(b)the second review shall be not later than nine hours after the first;
(c)subsequent reviews shall be at intervals of not more than nine hours.
(4) A review may be postponed—
(a)if, having regard to all the circumstances prevailing at the latest time for it specified in paragraph (3), it is not practicable to carry out the review at that time;
(b)without prejudice to the generality of sub‐paragraph (a)—
(i)if at that time the person in detention is being questioned by a police officer and the review officer is satisfied that an interruption of the questioning for the purpose of carrying out the review would prejudice the investigation in connection with which he is being questioned; or
(ii)if at that time no review officer is readily available.
(5) If a review is postponed under paragraph (4) it shall be carried out as soon as practicable after the latest time specified for it in paragraph (3).
(6) If a review is carried out after postponement under paragraph (4), the fact that it was so carried out shall not affect any requirement of this Article as to the time at which any subsequent review is to be carried out.
(7) The review officer shall record the reasons for any postponement of a review in the custody record.
(8) Subject to paragraph (9), where the person whose detention is under review has not been charged before the time of the review, Article 38(1) to (6) shall have effect in relation to him, but with[F1 the modifications specified in paragraph (8A)].
[F2(8A) The modifications are—
(a)the substitution of references to the person whose detention is under review for references to the person arrested;
(b)the substitution of references to the review officer for references to the custody officer; and
(c)in paragraph (6), the insertion after sub-paragraph (a) of—
“(aa)asleep;”.]
(9) Where a person has been kept in police detention by virtue of Article 38(9), Article 38(1) to (6) shall not have effect in relation to him but it shall be the duty of the review officer to determine whether he is yet in a fit state.
(10) Where the person whose detention is under review has been charged before the time of the review, Article 39(1) to (6) shall have effect in relation to him, but with [F3the modifications specified in paragraph (10A)].
[F4(10A) The modifications are—
(a)the substitution of references to the person whose detention is under review for any reference to the person arrested or to the person charged; and
(b)in paragraph (5), the insertion after sub-paragraph (a) of—
“(aa)asleep;”.]
(11) Where—
(a)an officer of higher rank than the review officer gives directions relating to a person in police detention; and
(b)the directions are at variance—
(i)with any decision made or action taken by the review officer in the performance of a duty imposed on him under this Part; or
(ii)with any decision or action which would but for the directions have been made or taken by him in the performance of such a duty,
the review officer shall refer the matter at once to an officer of the rank of superintendent or above who is responsible for the police station for which the review officer is acting as review officer in connection with the detention.
(12) Before determining whether to authorise a person's continued detention the review officer shall give—
(a)that person (unless he is asleep); or
(b)any solicitor representing him who is available at the time of the review,
an opportunity to make representations to him about the detention.
(13) Subject to paragraph (14), the person whose detention is under review or his solicitor may make representations under paragraph (12) either orally or in writing.
(14) The review officer may refuse to hear oral representations from the person whose detention is under review if he considers that he is unfit to make such representations by reason of his condition or behaviour.
F1Words in art. 41(8) substituted (1.3.2007) by Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/288 (N.I. 2)), arts. 1(2), 19(2)
F2Art. 41(8A) inserted (1.3.2007) by Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/288 (N.I. 2)), arts. 1(2), 19(3)
F3Words in art. 41(10) substituted (1.3.2007) by Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/288 (N.I. 2)), arts. 1(2), 19(4)
F4Art. 41(10A) inserted (1.3.2007) by Police and Criminal Evidence (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/288 (N.I. 2)), arts. 1(2), 19(5)
Modifications etc. (not altering text)
C1Art. 41 applied (with modifications) (1.12.2007) by Police and Criminal Evidence (Application to Revenue and Customs) Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 (S.R. 2007/464), arts. 3-15, Sch. 1, Sch. 2