Textual Amendments
F1Words in cross-heading preceding Sch. 10 para. 30 substituted (1.10.2009) by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4), ss, 40, 148, {Sch. 9 para. 117(6)}; S.I. 2009/1604, art. 2(a)(d)
31U.K.An appeal against a determination of a devolution issue by—
(a)a court of two or more judges of the High Court of Justiciary (whether in the ordinary course of proceedings or on a reference under paragraph 27); or
(b)a court of three or more judges of the Court of Session from which there is no appeal to the [F2Supreme Court apart from this paragraph] ,
shall lie to the [F3Supreme Court] , but only with [F4permission] of the court concerned or, failing such [F4permission] , with [F5permission] of the [F3Supreme Court] .
Textual Amendments
F2Words in Sch. 10 para. 31 substituted (1.10.2009) by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4), ss. 40, 148, Sch. 9 para. 117(8)(a); S.I. 2009/1604, art. 2(a)(d)
F3Words in Sch. 10 para. 31 substituted (1.10.2009) by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4), ss. 40, 148, Sch. 9 para. 117(8)(b); S.I. 2009/1604, art. 2(a)(d)
F4Words in Sch. 10 para. 31 substituted (1.10.2009) by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4), ss. 40, 148, Sch. 9 para. 117(8)(c); S.I. 2009/1604, art. 2(a)(d)
F5Words in Sch. 10 para. 31 substituted (1.10.2009) by Constitutional Reform Act 2005 (c. 4), ss. 40, 148, Sch. 9 para. 117(8)(d); S.I. 2009/1604, art. 2(a)(d)