Variation of limitation of candidate election expenses

2.  In article 35(2) of the Police and Crime Commissioner Elections Order 2012, in Table 2—

(a) in the entry for Avon & Somerset, for “£222,851” substitute “£305,130”;

(b) in the entry for Bedfordshire, for “£83,681” substitute “£114,570”;

(c) in the entry for Cambridgeshire, for “£108,754” substitute “£148,910”;

(d) in the entry for Cheshire, for “£142,720” substitute “£195,410”;

(e) in the entry for Cleveland, for “£76,889” substitute “£105,280”;

(f) in the entry for Cumbria, for “£72,231” substitute “£98,900”;

(g) in the entry for Derbyshire, for “£141,933” substitute “£194,340”;

(h) in the entry for Devon and Cornwall, for “£233,281” substitute “£319,410”;

(i) in the entry for Dorset, for “£106,888” substitute “£146,350”;

(j) in the entry for Durham, for “£89,055” substitute “£121,930”;

(k) in the entry for Dyfed-Powys, for “£72,622” substitute “£99,430”;

(l) in the entry for Essex, for “£234,412” substitute “£320,960”;

(m) in the entry for Gloucestershire, for “£86,344” substitute “£118,220”;

(n) in the entry for Gwent, for “£78,422” substitute “£107,370”;

(o) in the entry for Hampshire, for “£260,591” substitute “£356,810”;

(p) in the entry for Hertfordshire, for “£151,378” substitute “£207,270”;

(q) in the entry for Humberside, for “£126,520” substitute “£173,230”;

(r) in the entry for Kent, for “£228,338” substitute “£312,650”;

(s) in the entry for Lancashire, for “£201,729” substitute “£276,210”;

(t) in the entry for Leicestershire, for “£140,496” substitute “£192,370”;

(u) in the entry for Lincolnshire, for “£99,900” substitute “£136,780”;

(v) in the entry for Merseyside, for “£182,529” substitute “£249,920”;

(w) in the entry for Norfolk, for “£120,662” substitute “£165,210”;

(x) in the entry for North Wales, for “£95,241” substitute “£130,400”;

(y) in the entry for North Yorkshire, for “£111,814” substitute “£153,100”;

(z) in the entry for Northamptonshire, for “£95,663” substitute “£130,980”;

(aa) in the entry for Northumbria, for “£195,548” substitute “£267,750”;

(bb) in the entry for Nottinghamshire, for “£146,305” substitute “£200,320”;

(cc) in the entry for South Wales, for “£174,179” substitute “£238,490”;

(dd) in the entry for South Yorkshire, for “£178,637” substitute “£244,590”;

(ee) in the entry for Staffordshire, for “£153,313” substitute “£209,920”;

(ff) in the entry for Suffolk, for “£100,698” substitute “£137,880”;

(gg) in the entry for Surrey, for “£154,401” substitute “£211,410”;

(hh) in the entry for Sussex, for “£219,983” substitute “£301,210”;

(ii) in the entry for Thames Valley, for “£303,303” substitute “£415,290”;

(jj) in the entry for Warwickshire, for “£76,476” substitute “£104,710”;

(kk) in the entry for West Mercia, for “£168,735” substitute “£231,030”;

(ll) in the entry for West Midlands, for “£357,435” substitute “£489,410”;

(mm) in the entry for Wiltshire, for “£93,682” substitute “£128,270”.