Search Legislation

Deregulation Act 2015

Modification of the definitive map and statement by consent

611.Paragraph 5 inserts two new sections into the 1981 Act: sections 54B and 54C. The new section 54B sets out a new procedure by which an authority may by order modify the definitive map in consequence of:

a)

an application under section 53(5) of the Act; or

b)

the discovery of evidence that a right of way exists; or

c)

there having been a period of use by the public that raises a presumption of deemed dedication.

612.The new procedure is available where:

a)

the documentary evidence in support of the application is evidence that relates to the existence of a right of way before 1949; and

b)

where there has been an application under section 53(5) of the 1981 Act, the authority have served notice under paragraph 2(4)(b) of Schedule 13A to the Act (preliminary assessment and notice of applications: England).

Figure 1 illustrates how the process would fit into the revised procedures for making a definitive map modification order.

The above is Figure 1

613.Under the new procedure, the authority is required to ascertain whether every owner of the land to which the application relates consents to the making of the order modifying the definitive map. The landowner (or landowners) may only be willing to consent to the order modifying the definitive map if, at the same time, certain changes are authorised to the alleged public right of way. Under the new subsection (2) an authority may therefore make one or more of the following further orders, known as “special orders”, in order to secure the landowner’s (or the landowners’) consent:

a)

a diversion order;

b)

an order altering the width of the path or way;

c)

an order imposing a new limitation or condition affecting the right of way.

614.The new subsection (4) provides that if the landowner (or every landowner if there is more than one) consents to the making of an order under section 53(2) (without the making of a special order) the authority may make the order. The order must include a statement that it is made with the consent of the landowner (or every landowner if there is more than one).

615.The new subsection (5) provides that if the landowner (or one or more of the landowners) would consent only if one or more special orders are made, the authority may make the special order (or orders) and the order under section 53(2). Under the new subsection (6) the authority must, before making any special order diverting a right of way, be satisfied that the path or way will not be substantially less convenient to the public in consequence of the diversion and have regard to any guidance given by the Secretary of State. The order must include a statement that it is made with the consent of the landowner (or every landowner if there is more than one). The authority must, under subsection (5)(c), combine any special orders and the order under section 53(2) into a single document.

616.The new subsection (9) provides that an authority must determine whether to make such an order before 12 months have elapsed since the authority first notified the landowner of their decision that the definitive map and statement should be modified. The Secretary of State may extend that 12 month period by order (see new subsection (10)).

617.This measure will reduce the burden on a landowner (or landowners) of the impact of a newly discovered public right of way that conflicts with the current land usage. It will have the secondary effect of reducing the number of applications that are opposed by landowners and result in submission of a case to the Secretary of State to determine. It will also reduce the administrative burden on surveying authorities and others involved in the process by providing, in certain cases, a single procedure under which a change to a public right of way can be authorised as well as the recording of the right of way on the definitive map.

618.The new section 54C makes new provision to supplement the new procedure. The new provision provides that:

a)

a modification consent order cannot alter the termination point of a right of way if that point is not on a highway;

b)

a modification consent order cannot divert the right of way onto land owned by another landowner without the other landowner’s consent;

c)

where a modification consent order takes effect, any path or way shown on the definitive map and statement in consequence is maintainable at the public expense;

d)

where work is required to be done to bring the path or way, or the part, into a fit condition for use by the public, the authority may not confirm the order under Schedule 14A until they are satisfied that the work has been carried out.

Back to top

Options/Help

Print Options

Close

Explanatory Notes

Text created by the government department responsible for the subject matter of the Act to explain what the Act sets out to achieve and to make the Act accessible to readers who are not legally qualified. Explanatory Notes were introduced in 1999 and accompany all Public Acts except Appropriation, Consolidated Fund, Finance and Consolidation Acts.

Close

More Resources

Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. Dependent on the legislation item being viewed this may include:

  • the original print PDF of the as enacted version that was used for the print copy
  • lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item
  • confers power and blanket amendment details
  • all formats of all associated documents
  • correction slips
  • links to related legislation and further information resources
Close

Impact Assessments

Impact Assessments generally accompany all UK Government interventions of a regulatory nature that affect the private sector, civil society organisations and public services. They apply regardless of whether the regulation originates from a domestic or international source and can accompany primary (Acts etc) and secondary legislation (SIs). An Impact Assessment allows those with an interest in the policy area to understand:

  • Why the government is proposing to intervene;
  • The main options the government is considering, and which one is preferred;
  • How and to what extent new policies may impact on them; and,
  • The estimated costs and benefits of proposed measures.